Approximately how long have you been teaching?

Summary/Abstract

Background: Evidence says that a program like INSPIRE will be effective in improving student learning and engagement.

Primary Aim: Does INSPIRE improve predictors of evidence based teaching at ACU?

Evidence-based teaching is influenced by the staff's COM–B: capability, opportunity,  motivation, and self reported behaviour.

Secondary Aim: What's working well? What could be better?

We will measure website analytics and user engagement of INSPIRE site. We will also conduct qualitative interviews of people who use and don't use the program.

Methods

• Primary Method: Broad sweep of ACU population
• Secondary Method: Feedback from users of the program

Invitation Email

• Pre-workshop invitation email
• University wide invitation email

Hypotheses

• Staff will be more likely to plan to use systematic reviews in their teaching if they...
• We can increase all five of these through our combination of...

Items assessing COM-B of Systematic Reviews

Reference documents

Validated COM-B Measure.docx

Other post-test for users of the site

1. The modality of presenting the INSPIRE Website/toolkit was aesthetically appealing
2. I found the screen layout of the INSPIRE Website/toolkit to be visually pleasing
3. I found the INSPIRE Website/toolkit confusing to use*
4. I felt annoyed while using the INSPIRE Website/toolkit *
5. I felt interested in the INSPIRE Website/toolkit
6. The content of the INSPIRE Website/toolkit incited my curiosity